No question Roberts is smart,
and slick, and quick with a quip.
That is reason enough to vote no,

but he keeps views on major issues a
secret
, and brags about representing
whichever litigant showed up first.

An evasive nominee who takes either
side of any issue should be rejected –
demand a sense of right and wrong.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


-->